Saturday, 27 June 2015

Frodsham Windfarm - Map of the turbines



I asked Peel to produce this map.  It shows the position of the 19 turbines and the distances between the turbines and the nearest occupied house in each of the surrounding parishes.

All of the turbines are phyiscally in Frodsham.  The turbine to be sited near Marsh Lane, Frodsham is the closest of all to any housing.

This map is useful when considering which communities have an interest in the turbines, the construction work and any community benefit fund.  It sets out clearly the underlying facts.

Friday, 26 June 2015

Frodsham Windfarm update

Cllr Lynn Riley and I were shown around the wind farm construction site on the marshes today.  Most of the access roads, crane pads and turbine locations now have their access tracks built.  The next stage, likely to start in early July is the piling stage for the turbine foundations.

I'm pleased to report that, so far at least, there have been no complaints associated with the building works - even if many of us may still complain that the wind farm is being 'imposed' on us.

As someone who has cycled a lot on the marshes - and hopes to again soon - I was pleased to see the miles of access track that will be available for cyclist to use in the future.  I was also pleased to see that cyclists on national cycle route 5 that crosses the marshes have priority over the construction traffic.

Peel and their construction partners CHC were at pains to point out the quality of their environmental stewardship and how they are protecting the bird habitats, and badger sets.  In fact the need to protect the badgers have led to an access ramp being built near Grow How so as to leave the badgers undisturbed.


We were given the full tour of the construction site.  I took lots of photographs.  However as there is little to see above ground at the moment they are not that interesting to view - however I was interested in the way in which the access ways are being constructed on the soft ground of the marshes.

Most of the marshes are, in fact land that was reclaimed when the Ship Canal was contructed.  The land has been used as 'deposit grounds' for the silt dredged out of the Ship Canal and as such the land if very soft.  The road contractors have had to use a fibre membrane reinforced with plastic mesh to suppport the compacted stone roadway.  You can see elements of this in the photograph below.


This is the access ramp being contructed near Grow How showing the membrane and the mesh.


This is the site of the turbine pad closest to Frodsham


This is a roadway that has subsided and showed that the road contractors had to use a stronger membrane on the soft silty ground.  The 'failed' roadway has been replaced with a new access track parrallel to the original one.  The original one will be lifted in due course.

The contractor has 24hr security on site and a whole series of security measures I'm not going to describe.  Lynn and I have asked Cheshire Police to ensure to keep the marshes under scrutiny - and they have agreed to increase their surveillance.

Lynn and I also took the opportunity to have a lengthy discussion about the potential arrangements for the Community Benefit Fund and the Liaison Panel.



Wednesday, 24 June 2015

CWaC Statement of Accounts for 2014-15 .

At CWaC's Audit & Governance Committee last night we got the first overview of CWaC's accounts for the 2014-15 municipal year.  The accounts are in the course of being audited - and the committee will have the audited accounts presented to it in August 2015.

These provisional accounts showed just how well CWaC has performed financially.  Here are some of the highlights from the report presented:


  • CWaC saved an additional £2m on its revenue expenditure more than had been budgeted for.
  • 'Overall the Council continues to demonstrate a healthy financial position, a strong balance sheet with net assets of £508m (up £24.5m) and a General Fund balance of £21.8m (up £0.5m).
  • 'The General Fund balance reflects the Council's core reserves and these increased from £21.3m to £21.8m; this value represents 8% of the budgeted cost of the services in 2014-15.  During the year the Council approved a Reserve Strategy which included a risk adjusted assessment of the target level for the general fund.  This indicated that the Council should seek to retain the reserve between £18.8m-£21.8m to be prudent and give the Council flexibility in future decision making.  The position at 31 March 2015 is at the top of this range and will therefore provide the Council with some flexibility in the future.'
I pointed out to the Committee what a 'golden legacy' had been bequeathed to the incoming Labour administration notwithstanding the public sector austerity of the last 5 years.  I hope they won't squander it for all our sakes.

Friday, 22 May 2015

Labour rides roughshod at CWaC's annual council meeting

Every year each local authority has to have an annual council.  In most years this is nothing more than a yearly formality.  However last night's meeting at Chester's Town Hall was one of the most brutal I've ever witnessed.  Constitutional norms and conventions were swept aside - along with any attempt at consultation.

Labour took control of the council at the elections with, what appears on paper at least, to be the slenderest of margins:

38 Labour
36 Conservative
1 Independent

In theory this gives them a majority of 1.

The reality on the ground, at least so far as those of us on the Conservative benches are concerned is that we suspect the independent will largely vote with Labour - in effect giving the ruling party a 39-36 majority.  Slim - but workable.  Actions will show whether, in fact, our suspicions are justified.

When CWaC was created there was a desire to keep the Lord Mayor of Chester.  However as the Government at the time indicated that the Royal Prerogative would not be exercised to enlarge the Lord Mayorship to the entire Borough something of a compromise had to be created.  There was no desire to have a Mayor of CWaC and a Lord Mayor of Chester side by side - so CWaC would be represented by the Chairman of the Council, who on the basis of the convention established would also be Lord Mayor of Chester.

The Lord Mayor would be a-political - and by convention the Chairman of the Council would and should be a-political too.  This compromise kept the historic Lord Mayorship of Chester and allowed CWaC to minimise cost by having one person and one civic team representing the Borough.  Whether he or she wore the Mayoral Chain at any particular event would depend on whether the event was within or outside the old Chester District boundary.

These arrangements have been maintained throughout the 7 years since CWaC was created.  We have had Labour and Conservative Chairmen and women who have also served as Lord Mayor of Chester.

For the 2015-16 year, under the convention, the next scheduled Chairman and Lord Mayor of Chester was to be Conservative Cllr Hugo Deynam.   Last night Labour threw that convention away and created a political Chairman of the Council.  Last year's Lord Mayor and Chairman Cllr Bob Rudd was re-appointed Chairman.  Cllr Deynam did become Lord Mayor.

To my mind this step was unnecessary constitutional vandalism - that will breed resentment and difficulties for years to come.  It may also have increased the costs of civic representation in the Borough.  We don't know whether it has or not - as this appears to be one of those details which has not yet been worked out.  There is also the question whether those of us living outside the old Chester district would value a political figure attending our events as opposed to an a-political figure.

An a-political Chairman rarely, if ever votes at Council meetings.  This would mean that a Conservative Chairman would, in effect put the Conservatives 1 down - entrenching Labour's majority.  Now Labour would be worried whether the Conservative Chairman would ever be called upon to exercise a casting vote.   However the convention followed by most councils and Parliaments is that the a-political Chairman should vote to support the status quo - or vote to support the ruling group.

To my mind Labour could have negotiated this, and further entrenched their majority.  However they chose instead to create a political Chairman... and we saw that last night where Cllr Rudd, exercised his vote on several occasions.  He even commented that he was doing it - sensing internally I'm sure, that this was a departure from last year when he was an a-political chairman.  Labour also appointed a Labour Deputy Chairman.  In my view this was a mistake as Cllr Deynam could have been retained as Deputy Chairman and thus been allowed to act as the civic representative for the entire Borough by being the Deputy.  This would have been a workable compromise - and in fact is the model we followed in Frodsham when separating the Chairmanship of that council from the Mayor of Frodsham role.

Now the decisions about who will be the Lord Mayor of Chester, the Deputy Lord Mayor and the Sheriff of Chester are not made by CWaC - but are made, instead by the Charter Trustees.  These Charter Trustees are in essence the councillors from the old Chester District part of the Borough, who have the power to co-opt Councillors from outside the old Chester area onto the Trustees - thereby enabling these 'outsiders' to become Lord Mayor or Sheriff of Chester.

CWaC can proffer nominees for co-option and as part of the brutalist approach by Labour they nominated 3 Labour Councillors to join the Charter Trustees - and no Conservatives.

Until last night the Charter Trustees had a 15:13 Conservative Majority.  The Charter Trustees last night declined to accept 2 out of the 3 Labour nominees. So whilst this allowed the expected incoming civic team to take their places (two of whom are Labour Councillors) this also meant that 'business as usual' was not maintained.

Personally I want to see sense prevail rapidly and with a return to the conventions.  This would see Cllr Hugo Deynam placed as Chairman of the Council and the honour of fulfilling the civic roles offered on rotation to the next senior councillor who had not fulfilled the role before irrespective of party.  If this doesn't happen we could have the bizarre situation of someone attending a council meeting expecting to leave as an ordinary member - however instead they may leave as Deputy Lord Mayor or Sheriff of Chester!

Now not everyone sees the performance of civic roles as important - and I can understand the point of view... but the vandalism didn't end there.

The Labour group brought in, without any meaningful consultation, or any semblance of explanation wholesale changes to the committee structures.  They greatly reduced the number of scrutiny committees - dispensing, at stroke, with detailed scrutiny of the finances, children and vulnerable adult safeguarding.  They also dispensed with a tradition I fought hard to create - giving Chairmanships of scrutiny committees to the opposition party.  The Conservatives have been given no Chairmanships in spite of the fact we are the largest ever opposition group on CWaC.

The Labour group has appointed the one independent member as Chairman of Overview and Scrutiny.  However, if we are right, and that this independent isn't really as independent as he might at first sight appear, then this would appear to be nothing more than further cynical manipulation by Labour.   I hope I'm wrong about this.

It would have cost Labour nothing to have followed the norms and conventions.  They could have used the first 2-3 months to work out what they wanted to do - and made the necessary changes at the July Council, or indeed a special council meeting called for that purpose.  They could have generated goodwill by doing so.  Instead we have seen a brutal ripping up of conventions, norms and niceties.
With such a slender majority working by consensus would have made sense in my view.  Clearly Labour have signalled that they have no intention of seeking consensus or the middle ground.

Now that we have a political chairman I wonder how I will address him?  Is it comrade, commissar or perhaps convenor?   Whatever it is, it is with a great deal less respect than was due to the a-political Chairman he once was.  It was and is all so unnecessary.  It was and is so disrespectful.





Monday, 11 May 2015

Labour take control of CWaC

In the local government elections that took place on the same day as the General Election Labour took control of CWaC.

The new council comprises:

38 Labour Councillors;
36 Conservative Councillors; and
01 Independent.

Labour therefore has a majority of 1.

One of the interesting quirks of this election is that Labour took the majority of the council seats but didn't take the majority of the votes:

PartySeats Votes% Share
Labour38115,473
Conservative36120,477
Other16,620
Green015,802
UKIP020,882
Liberal Democrats023,887

The turnout for these elections varied from 55.7% in Ellesmere Port to 78% in Chester Villages.  In Frodsham our turnout figure was 71.4%

We all face a difficult 4 years now.  With the numbers being so tight everyone will be expected to attend every meeting.  There will be little opportunity for holidays, business meetings or illnesses.  It will be interesting to see whether control shifts again before the next round of 'all out' elections in 2019.  A couple of by-elections is all it would take.